<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Science Vs. Religion?	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://rupertslandnews.ca/science-vs-religion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://rupertslandnews.ca/science-vs-religion/</link>
	<description>News from the Diocese of Rupert&#039;s Land in the Anglican Church of Canada</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2022 22:18:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Gloria Roamniuk		</title>
		<link>https://rupertslandnews.ca/science-vs-religion/#comment-44152</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gloria Roamniuk]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2015 16:26:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rupertslandnews.ca/?p=1410#comment-44152</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Thank you, Professor Waterman, for this thought-provoking and succinctly-written article. You touch on many important matters in a clear, progressive manner. I very much enjoyed exploring these concepts with you, so to speak. I was struck by the analogies you use, in particular the distinctions you draw between falsification of religious knowledge and falsification of scientific knowledge. I think you are quite right: religious knowledge, and perhaps its falsification, is entirely personal and subjective, though it can be found within a community. Far different from the context of scientific knowledge which must always have community. I look forward to future articles!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you, Professor Waterman, for this thought-provoking and succinctly-written article. You touch on many important matters in a clear, progressive manner. I very much enjoyed exploring these concepts with you, so to speak. I was struck by the analogies you use, in particular the distinctions you draw between falsification of religious knowledge and falsification of scientific knowledge. I think you are quite right: religious knowledge, and perhaps its falsification, is entirely personal and subjective, though it can be found within a community. Far different from the context of scientific knowledge which must always have community. I look forward to future articles!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
